Perhaps no other method of treatment and recovery has been so indiscriminately and unfairly criticized as therapeutic fasting.
And all this is only because most people associate therapeutic fasting with forced fasting. Drug manufacturers have large material resources. They are not interested in the development of drug-free therapies and are ready to finance any criticism. There is no need to criticize drug-free treatment methods. It is enough not to support them and they will be consigned to oblivion. After all, drug therapy is constantly promoted and advertised. In such a “layout” it simply can not help but gain the upper hand. Drugs are a good commodity, giving a good profit. You cannot make drug-free therapy a marketable commodity. I don’t think we can go any further.
But the most unpleasant thing is that most of all famous nutritionists write about the harm of fasting, who, on the contrary, should be very well versed in the therapeutic mechanisms of fasting. It is a shame that they unilaterally describe the processes occurring in the body during fasting without understanding them at all, and at the same time they manage to describe these therapeutic mechanisms as a great harm for a person. But this is not even the worst thing, the other thing is terrible: people, having read these articles, will never fast, although the earlier the treatment by fasting is started, the more chances to be completely cured of many diseases. On the other hand, “competently” criticizing starvation, they can offer nothing in return, advertising only their methods, which can never have such a multifaceted, effective therapeutic effect on the whole organism as therapeutic starvation.
